BRCGS Food Safety F837 Position Statement Clause 1.1.2
- Clause 1.1.1 requires a policy which states the site’s intention to meet its obligation to produce safe, legal and authentic products to the specified quality that also includes a commitment to continuously improve the site’s food safety and quality culture
- Clause 1.1.2 Requires the site’s senior management shall define and maintain a clear plan for the development and continuing improvement of a food safety and quality culture. The plan shall include measures needed to achieve a positive culture change.
- Clause 1.1.4 requires the food safety and quality culture plan to be evaluated during the review process at Management review meetings which must be attended by the site’s senior management.
- Clause 1.1.11 requires a member of the senior management team on site to be available during the certification audit, and subsequent audits, for a discussion on effective implementation of the food safety and quality culture plan.
Previous BRCGS Food Safety Issue 8 F837: Position Statement:
Clause 1.1.2 Define and maintain a clear plan for the development and continuing improvement of food safety culture
BRCGS has issued a position statement to ensure expectations relating to compliance with clause 1.1.2; its consistent application at certificated sites, and assessment during audits are understood.
In summary, the clause requires sites to: Define and maintain a clear plan for the development and continuing improvement of food safety culture.
This plan must include:
Clearly defined activities that will be completed
Involve all sections of the site that have an impact of product safety (whilst specific activities may be relevant to certain departments or roles, overall the plan must ensure that all relevant section/roles are covered)
An action plan indicating how the identified activities will be undertaken/completed
Measurement of the activities (i.e. where they completed, where the correct people involved, were activities successful, any other learnings)
Intended timescales for the completion of the activities
A review of the effectiveness of completed activities
Where sites are non-compliant, the non-conformities will be graded as follows:
Major Non-conformity
Where the site does not have a documented plan for food safety and quality culture. In this context a plan is more than a short statement of intent, but documentation incorporating the requirements of the clause (as summarised above).
Minor Non-conformity
Where a documented plan exists, but is: of poor quality (e.g. insufficiently detailed, for example missing timescales for completion or absence of clear action plans), does not cover all the relevant areas or staff and is not fully implemented (e.g. some activities not implemented or not completed to predefined schedule).
Site review of the effectiveness of completed activities
The third bullet point in the clause requires sites to undertake a review of the effectiveness of completed activities. As audits to the Standard only commenced in February 2019 it is possible that this review of the success of the programme, would not always be implemented in year 1 and therefore non-compliance with this bullet point is not considered a nonconformity until the site’s second audit to Issue 8.
Grading
The non-conformance shall be included in the calculation of the site grade.
Effective date: 1st June 2019
Source BRCGS News here: https://www.brcgs.com/media/1495789/f837-position-statements-for-issue-8-v2-03092019.pdf
How our Implementation Packages Assist in Compliance
Our Implementation Packages include tools and procedures to assist in complying with all the clauses of the BRCGS standard. As an example, for planning and developing a food safety culture we provide a template for Senior Management to use, below are some extracts and examples:
Food Safety Culture
The company recognises that a successful food safety culture is the product of individual and group values, attitudes, competencies and patterns of behaviour that determine the commitment to, and the style and proficiency of the food safety management system. The site’s senior management plan for the development and continuing improvement of food safety culture.
Senior management are responsible for delivering a “It is how we do things here” food safety culture by:
Leadership – starting from the top
Demonstrating visible commitment
Effective communication of company philosophy and policy
Ensuring there is accountability from the top of the organisation to the bottom
Developing employee confidence and mutual trust
Developing reward schemes including ‘Employee of the Month’ award
Ensuring all employees are accountable, engaged and understand the value of integrity and proactivity
Developing an action plan for the development and continuing improvement of food safety culture
Monitoring Food Safety Culture
Senior management monitor and measure through individual reposts and trend analysis the degree of development of the food safety culture by analysing information including KPIs from:
Hygiene & Housekeeping Audits
Internal Audits
External Audits
Non-conforming products
Environmental monitoring
Review of implementation plan and numbers trained
Employee reviews
Staff surveys on values and culture
Customer Complaints
Staff Turnover
Staff Exit Interviews
Results of monitoring are shared throughout the organisation.
Responsibilities
Senior management are responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of completed activities at the monthly Management Review meeting
Individual Food Safety Culture Development Table
All employees will undergo the following briefings and stages:
Food Safety Policy
Food Safety Objectives
Food Safety Management System Overview
Job Descriptions
Job Training
Employee Briefing
Individual Objectives
CCP Controls – Training Procedures & Record Completion
PRP Controls – Training Procedures & Record Completion
Employee Review
Reference
QM 1.1.2 Food Safety Culture Planning: